Beta Browsers Speed Tests

September 3rd, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Only a day after Google’s first beta release of their upcoming Chrome browser, people are already road-testing it.

Have a look at this Lifehacker post, where the current beta of Chrome, the current beta of the upcoming Firefox 3.1, and the current beta of Internet Explorer 8 are compared for Javascript & CSS performance, startup times, and memory usage.

From what I’ve seen across the web and in my own experience, the new Google Chrome sits right next to Firefox 3. Take that, Microsoft.

http://lifehacker.com/5044668/beta-browser-speed-tests-which-is-fastest

Google Chrome!

September 2nd, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Eep! Google has released their own web browser. Watch out Microsoft!

I took a look. It’s pretty nice. Not a lot of extra crap in the window to crowd your browsing experience. Very clean, and simple. It’s a little shabby on the png transparency, and some of the CSS3 features, but for their first Beta, it’s not bad.

You go Google!

Because it’s the cool thing to do…

December 19th, 2007 § 0 comments § permalink

So you want to switch from Windows Vista back to Windows XP, eh?

I have one thing to say about that: You’re dumb.

I know your “computer whiz” friend and the Apple Switch commercials want you to think it’s what everyone is doing, and it’s the best decision. But it’s not. Windows Vista has been out for almost a year (Business release date: 11/15/06; Consumer release date: 1/25/07), and I’ve been using it since March. Sure, it has some quirks (takes longer than desired to finish booting, looks/works a little different than XP), but what version of Windows doesn’t? It also has it’s advantages (better memory management, better multi-processor/64-bit support, faster API).

Chances are, if you’ve upgraded your computer to Vista, the reason it “sucks” is that your computer was built 4 years ago with the intent of running Windows XP, and simply doesn’t meet Vista’s requirements. If you’ve bought a new computer, and it sucks, I’m willing to bet you bought the bottom-notch model to save money, and you have a miniscule amount of RAM to work with, and probably only Windows Vista Home Basic.

Am I right? I bought an HP Pavilion dv9230us in March. Sure, it was a little pricy (after all, it is a high performance notebook), but a desktop with the same specs would have been dirt cheap. It came with Vista Home Premium, which I promptly upgraded to Vista Ultimate.

Since I have gotten Windows Vista:

- I have never seen a Blue Screen of Death
- I have NOT had to reinstall
- I have been able to leave my computer on for weeks on end, only putting it in standby to travel between work and home.
- I have had exactly 3 programs that were not compatible with Vista, and since then, all three have new versions that are.

All of these things would have been only pipe dreams with Windows XP.

And you know I’m right.

Stop being a pansy, get more RAM, get a new computer, tell your computer whiz friend to bite it, and don’t listen to the Apple commercials. I know Apple would have you believe that it’s what everyone else is doing, but it’s not. Look at the stats. According to w3schools, the amount of people who use windows Vista on the web increases by nearly 1% every month. Wanna know how much Apple’s users increase every month? Fractions of a percent. Fractions. As a matter of fact, their usage has increased by 0.1% since January. Eat that, Apple.

And your computer whiz friend probably doesn’t know what he’s talking about. As a matter of fact, I’d say it’s safe to say that most of those guys have no idea what they are talking about most of the time. If you really want to know something, either use your brain and look it up, or pay a professional to fix it.

Seriously.

And while you’re at it, switch to Firefox. Internet Explorer sucks. And so does Safari. Trust me, I’m a web developer, I know these things.

Windows Vista update

April 3rd, 2007 § 0 comments § permalink

Okay, so I have been using Windows Vista for just over 2 weeks now, and i am pretty satisfied. I have run into some issues with program compatibility that have irked me a bit…

Macromedia Fireworks 8, for example, is not compatible with the visual styles of Windows Vista. When I open Fireworks, windows reverts back to the standard, boring, not-pretty look to accomodate for Fireworks. This is a great idea, however on a few occasions, Windows has had some difficulty returning to it’s normal state when I close Fireworks. I have had to manually end and restart Explorer.exe a few times because of this.

Also, I am happy with the speed at which Windows Vista can boot when hibernated, however it takes a god-awful amount of time to go into hibernate, and unlike Windows XP, there is no bar telling you how far along it is. You get a blank screen. This is a bit unnerving to say the least.

There are also a lot of little things that they have changed that have gotten my attention. Stuff that I’ve been waiting for for a very long time. For example, instant and automatic setup of dual monitors. If the computer is on, and you want a second monitor, you plug it in. Windows automagically detects your monitor and it’s resolution (provided it is a standard resolution), and sets it up. It asks you which side of your primary screen you would like your secondary screen to be, and then it’s done. From that point on, it never asks again for that monitor. Pretty impressive.

Windows Media Center, although not a feature i really cared about when I decided to get Windows Vista, is also much improved from XP Media Center Edition. Although the interface is different and takes some getting used to, it is much more streamlined and smoother than the previous MCE. It is definitely aimed at ease-of-use and a true Media Center environment.

Another thing that I am pretty happy with is the visual styles. Now all you Mac users want to say Microsoft stole the idea from Apple, but I have used both, and they are nothing alike. If you want the truth, all of this transparency and pretty transitions business was actually available first to Linux users, not Mac users. Anyway, what impresses me most about the visual effects is that no matter how mush stuff I’ve got going on (and trust me, I usually have a lot of stuff open. Like, all of Macromedia Studio 8, most of Adobe CS2, most of Microsoft Office 2007, Firefox2, IE7, Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 for IE6 testing, iTunes 7, a background virus scanner, two messengers, the Windows Sidebar, Filezilla, and anywhere from 5-20 local and network folders), it all seems to work seemlessly. Not once have I had to wait for a visual effect to happen or dealt with choppy or jumpy transitions. Now, this is partially due to the fact that Windows Vista depends on the graphics processor for this instead of the CPU (which previous versions of Windows depended on).

All in all, Windows Vista is a good thing. It has broken free of my prediction that it would be a repeat of Windows Me (Millennium Edition).

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing entries tagged with Mozilla Firefox at Rick Ford.